By the numbers: How should we value the Steelers mid-round draft picks?

PITTSBURGH, PA - AUGUST 17: Anthony Chickillo #56 of the Pittsburgh Steelers in action during a preseason game against the Kansas City Chiefs on August 17, 2019 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Justin K. Aller/Getty Images)
PITTSBURGH, PA - AUGUST 17: Anthony Chickillo #56 of the Pittsburgh Steelers in action during a preseason game against the Kansas City Chiefs on August 17, 2019 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Justin K. Aller/Getty Images)
1 of 3

The Steelers build through the draft. How does their performance in rounds 2 through 5 translate to success or failure on the field?

In my seminal article in the “By the numbers” series, I wrote that middle round draft picks can make or break a team and that the Steelers have historically been good at finding quality players in rounds 2 through 5. I felt pretty good about myself for claiming as much and went so far as to list off great Steeler players of yore who were selected in these rounds, but was I correct?

It’s a simple enough question. Do mid-round picks that end up contributing make or break a team? After digging into the data, every pick in round 2 through 5 between the years 2010 and 2018, I think the answer is much less simple. It depends entirely on the team.

To evaluate teams’ effectiveness, I broke down every player drafted in this timeframe and assigned them a score.  Here is how the scoring system works.

Score 0:  Bust. Washed out of the league. Fewer than 15 games played. e.g. Chris Rainey.
Score 1: Career backup. Special teams contributor. e.g. Chris Carter.
Score 2: “Unremarkable” starter. Replaceable after 2 to 3 years. e.g. Jesse James.
Score 3: Starter for multiple seasons. Good player. e.g.  JuJu Smith-Schuster.
Score 4: Elite player. Multiple Pro Bowls/All-Pro. e.g. Emmanuel Sanders (the version who caught passes from Peyton Manning, not the version who caught passes from Big Ben).

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations